BERNEV / CUSTOMS LAW
Menu

INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND THE EAEU

Payment to China for goods said to be customs-cleared in Kyrgyzstan: what to check before an advance

Andrey Eduardovich BernevLawyer handling commercial court disputes and international trade

A Kyrgyz company invoices a Russian buyer. The CMR consignment note records collection in Kyrgyzstan. The seller says the Chinese goods have already been ‘customs cleared’ but asks for payment to a Chinese company. That arrangement does not, by itself, establish a violation. Nor does it answer the key question before an advance payment: what is the customs status of the specific goods being paid for?

The financial exposure depends on the answer. The goods may still be under customs transit, with Russian release, customs payments and evidence of customs value still to come. Goods already released in Kyrgyzstan or Kazakhstan that have acquired Union status follow a different route: SPOT requirements and indirect taxes must be checked separately. Release in Kazakhstan may bring a further restriction if a reduced WTO rate was used, preventing free movement to other EAEU states. ‘Customs cleared’ is too vague a description on which to base payment.

Checking documents at a freight terminal before paying for a shipment through the EAEU
The shipment’s route, customs status and payment recipient must form one transaction that the documents can explain.
Contents

What does the seller mean by ‘customs cleared’?

The seller may be referring to very different operations: entry into customs transit, release for domestic consumption in Kyrgyzstan, or release in Kazakhstan. The goods may even have entered the EAEU directly through Kazakhstan, with the Kyrgyz company involved only in the sale or payment arrangements. Until the history of this shipment is established, the buyer cannot tell whether it is buying foreign goods still requiring clearance or Union goods already released in an EAEU state.

Start by reconstructing the shipment’s journey, rather than asking for a generic ‘customs clearance document’. The invoice records the commercial transaction and payment claim; the seller’s country does not establish where the goods crossed the EAEU’s external border. The CMR provides evidence of the carriage contract and the carrier’s receipt of the goods within the information it records, so its collection location cannot simply be ignored. But a CMR alone does not establish the customs procedure or prove release for domestic consumption.

Reconstruct the route using documents for the same shipment. Compare the Chinese export declaration, the first EAEU transit or import declaration, CMR and other transport records, vehicle and container numbers, package counts, weights, markings and other identifiers. The aim is a continuous documentary record, not the largest possible file. A declaration for similar goods, an old CMR or a warehouse record for another shipment does not establish the status of the goods now being paid for.

Reconstructing the shipment’s journey

Where the goods entered the EAEU

The first distinction arises at the Union’s external border. Documents showing direct entry from China into Kazakhstan may mean there was no Kyrgyz customs operation at all. The Kyrgyz company’s role must then be established from the contract and payment records, while the customs history comes from Kazakhstan. Where entry through Kyrgyzstan is confirmed, the three main possibilities are transit to Russia, release for domestic consumption in Kyrgyzstan, or transit to Kazakhstan followed by release there.

Goods still under customs transit

Goods in transit through Kyrgyzstan do not acquire Union status merely by passing a customs post. They remain foreign goods and travel to the customs office of destination under the transit procedure. Where the destination is Russia, completion of transit must be followed by placement under the next customs procedure, usually release for domestic consumption.

Transit permits movement without actual payment of import duties and taxes, subject to the procedure’s conditions. It does not follow that security is required for every transit movement. Article 146 of the EAEU Customs Code sets both security requirements and exceptions. First establish whether security is required for this shipment. Where it is required and the route crosses several EAEU states, the amount must account for potential liabilities in the other states along the route, not just the state where transit began.

The buyer also needs to know when a document can actually exist. Transit declaration details cannot be supplied before the goods enter the procedure. Once transit has begun, however, and before a payment contractually tied to that stage, the customs office of destination, transit declarant, carrier and declaration details should be known, together with security details where required. ‘The carrier will handle it’ does not identify the procedure actually declared or where it must end.

A further control requirement became relevant to this route on 31 July 2026. In the second phase of navigation-seal tracking, all categories of goods carried by road under customs transit across two or more EAEU states are covered, subject to the specified exceptions. This directly affects the Kyrgyzstan–Kazakhstan–Russia route. Check the exceptions in EEC Council Decision No. 71 of 9 July 2026 rather than assuming that every shipment from Kyrgyzstan either requires a seal or is exempt.

Arrival of the truck does not itself complete transit. Under Article 151 of the EAEU Customs Code, documents must reach the customs office of destination within the prescribed period; customs then registers their submission and completes the procedure. For road transport, the basic submission period is three hours after arrival, or three hours from opening if the goods arrive outside customs office hours. Transit is generally completed within four working hours after document registration, with an extension permitted for physical inspection. For the transaction, the decisive point is the legal outcome: a driver’s ‘the truck has arrived’ is not confirmation that transit is complete.

Why the payment goes to China

Payment to the Chinese company is particularly important where the goods remain under transit. Article 39 of the EAEU Customs Code does not require every payment for the goods being valued to reach the seller directly. The price actually paid or payable includes payments by the buyer to the seller or to another person for the seller’s benefit. A transfer to a Chinese company does not therefore rule out the transaction value method. The documents must explain which obligation is being performed, whose benefit the payment serves and which goods it covers.

A Russian buyer’s payment to China on the Kyrgyz seller’s instructions should be supported by the contract, an amendment or tripartite agreement, a payment instruction or another document linking the payment to that shipment. Where the Chinese company is a separate seller in the China–Kyrgyzstan–Russia chain, Russian clearance requires identifying which actual sale meets the conditions for a sale for export to the Union’s customs territory and reconciling the contracts, prices and payments. A Kyrgyz invoice and payment order alone may not establish this.

Goods released in Kyrgyzstan

Release for domestic consumption in Kyrgyzstan changes the position. Ordinary release gives the goods Union status. They do not need to undergo the same release procedure again in Russia merely because they arrive from another EAEU state. That does not remove all Russian obligations. In intra-EAEU trade, indirect taxes and tax reporting require separate assessment, including the indirect tax return and the statement of importation of goods and payment of indirect taxes where EAEU rules and Russian law require them.

First, however, establish that Kyrgyz release actually occurred. The buyer needs the import declaration details and the customs release decision, not the seller’s assurance or a standalone ‘clearance certificate’. Check the declarant too. Neither the invoice seller nor the CMR consignee automatically holds that role. Article 83 of the EAEU Customs Code determines who may act as declarant; the particular declaration identifies who actually did.

Then link that declaration to the goods being purchased. The TN VED tariff code, description, model or product reference, quantity, weight, packaging, markings, serial numbers and other identifiers must allow the documents to be matched. Differences caused by transshipment, repacking or changed package counts need a documentary explanation. A goods declaration for a similar product does not establish the status of the current shipment.

An importer and logistics specialist compare shipment documents with the actual cargo
Before paying an advance, trace the goods, route, customs status and payment together instead of relying on a ‘clearance certificate’.

Ordinary and conditional release

Ordinary and conditional release have different consequences. Article 126 of the EAEU Customs Code covers, among other cases, relief subject to restrictions on use or disposal, goods for which compliance with certain prohibitions and restrictions is confirmed after release, and goods released at lower rates under special international arrangements. Until the Code’s conditions are met, those goods retain foreign status and remain under customs control. A release decision does not always permit unrestricted sale to another EAEU state.

Kazakhstan’s WTO rates and movement restrictions

This distinction is especially important for release in Kazakhstan. Its WTO commitments create a special tariff regime for certain goods, based on the Protocol of 16 October 2015. The lists and related EEC decisions have since changed. Check the specific code against the applicable rules rather than a table saved several years ago.

Goods on the relevant Exemptions List imported into Kazakhstan at a reduced WTO rate cannot automatically be treated as freely movable to Russia. Kazakhstan’s State Revenue Committee guidance prohibits their movement to other EAEU states. For listed goods imported at the EAEU Common Customs Tariff rate and then moved to another Union state, the Committee identifies applicable cases requiring certified copies of the electronic invoice and goods declaration to accompany them.

For release in Kazakhstan, a declaration number and release decision are not enough. Before payment, check the goods code, the rate actually applied and the documents establishing this shipment’s eligibility for onward movement. ‘The goods are already in the EAEU’ does not resolve a missing link between those records.

When SPOT applies

Confirmed release in Kyrgyzstan or Kazakhstan raises a further Russian requirement: SPOT. Customs status, rather than Chinese origin or the seller’s country, determines its relevance. Federal Law No. 101-ФЗ of 17 April 2026 defines goods for SPOT purposes as property with EAEU goods status. Foreign goods continuing under customs transit until release in Russia therefore fall outside SPOT.

For Union goods entering Russia by road from another EAEU state, assess SPOT under Article 5 of Law No. 101-ФЗ and its exceptions. The CMR consignee field does not determine who must apply. Article 3 links that role to the Russian organisation or individual entrepreneur bringing in the goods, or, in specified cases, Russian mandataries, commission agents, other agents and certain branches or representative offices. Before dispatch, establish who will prepare the DOPP expected-delivery document and be responsible for its information.

The DOPP must generally be prepared at least two calendar days before the day of entry. Where no security payment is required, the special deadline is at least four hours before entry. Where required, the security payment must be made at least two calendar days before the day of entry and cover no less than the indirect taxes on the goods listed in the DOPP. The carrier must receive the visualised link before beginning carriage into Russia.

The general June exemption for Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan has ended. Russian Government Resolution No. 641 of 29 May 2026 exempted the relevant deliveries from the security payment from 1 to 30 June 2026. Since 1 July, deliveries from Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan have been subject to the general regime unless the applicant or transaction qualifies for an exemption under Article 11 of Law No. 101-ФЗ or a government decision.

Payment conditions to agree in the contract

Before an advance, establish the facts already available: the seller, payment recipient, legal basis for payment to China, location of the shipment, intended or actual EAEU entry point, agreed customs arrangement and intended declarant. Where the seller says release has already occurred, the declaration and release details should be available before payment. They are no longer future documents.

Where a customs operation is still ahead, link later payments in the contract to the documents it will produce. For transit, these are the declaration details and, where relevant to payment, confirmed completion. For release, require the import declaration, release information and confirmation that conditional status does not prevent onward sale or movement. In Kazakhstan, add the rate actually used and documents required under the WTO arrangements. For Union goods, check SPOT before entry into Russia where it applies.

Three questions before paying an advance

Initial document review

What to provide for an initial assessment

The first checks cover the document received, receipt date, current stage and nearest deadline.

What happened
A customs document has arrived
Why it matters
the first response records your account of the transaction and can affect an appeal, court case, payments and penalties
Deadline
receipt date and response deadline
Scope of work
initial legal assessment and next step
Documents and details
  • document received
  • receipt date
  • timeline
  • previous responses